When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
We are now using an env_ prefix for environment functions. Rename these
two functions for consistency. Also add function comments in common.h.
Quite a few places use getenv() in a condition context, provoking a
warning from checkpatch. These are fixed up in this patch also.
Suggested-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
There is no more define of CONFIG_SYS_HUSH_PARSER. Rename some
remaining references and drop the backward compatible Kconfig entry.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Patch f8bb6964 (Drop command-processing code when CONFIG_CMDLINE is
disabled) introduced a small typo. This patch fixes it and unbreaks
all boards again that don't have the Hush parser enabled.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Command parsing and processing code is not needed when the command line is
disabled. Remove this code in that case.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Whether CONFIG_SYS_HUSH_PARSER is defined or not, should always
check to free 'buff' to avoid memory leak.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The console includes a global variable and several functions that are only
used by a small subset of U-Boot files. Before adding more functions, move
the definitions into their own header file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
We have flipped CONFIG_SPL_DISABLE_OF_CONTROL. We have cleansing
devices, $(SPL_) and CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(), so we are ready to clear
away the ugly logic in include/fdtdec.h:
#ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL
# if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && !defined(SPL_OF_CONTROL)
# define OF_CONTROL 0
# else
# define OF_CONTROL 1
# endif
#else
# define OF_CONTROL 0
#endif
Now CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_CONTROL) is the substitute. It refers to
CONFIG_OF_CONTROL for U-boot proper and CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL for
SPL.
Also, we no longer have to cancel CONFIG_OF_CONTROL in
include/config_uncmd_spl.h and scripts/Makefile.spl.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The run command treats each argument an an environment variable. It gets the
value of each variable and executes it as a command. If an environment
variable contains a newline and the hush cli is used, it is supposed to
execute each line one after the other.
Normally a newline signals to hush to exit - this is used in normal command
line entry - after a command is entered we want to return to allow the user
to enter the next one. But environment variables obviously need to execute
to completion.
Add a special case for the execution of environment variables which
continues when a newline is seen, and add a few tests to check this
behaviour.
Note: it's not impossible that this may cause regressions in other areas.
I can't think of a case but with any change of behaviour with limited test
coverage there is always a risk. From what I can tell this behaviour has
been around since at least U-Boot 2011.03, although this pre-dates sandbox
and I have not tested it on real hardware.
Reported-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
run_command() returns 0 on success and 1 on error. However, there are some
invocations which expect 0 or 1 for success (not repeatable or repeatable)
and -1 for error; add run_command_repeatable() for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Betker <thomas.betker@rohde-schwarz.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
bootdelay_process() never returns in some circumstances, whichs makes the
control flow confusing. Change it so that the decision about how to execute
the boot command is made in the main_loop() code, so it is easier to follow.
Move CLI stuff to cli.c.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tom Rini
Simon Glass
Masahiro Yamada
Stefan Roese
Peng Fan
Thomas Betker