In some cases it is useful to add a group of files to the image and be
able to access them at run-time. Of course it is possible to generate
the binman config file with a set of blobs each with a filename. But for
convenience, add an entry type which can do this.
Add required support (for adding nodes and string properties) into the
state module.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Binman currently supports updating the main device tree with things like
the position of each entry. Extend this support to SPL and TPL as well,
since they may need (a subset of) this information.
Also adjust DTB output files to have a .out extension since this seems
clearer than having a .dtb extension with 'out' in the name somwhere.
Also add a few missing comments and update the DT setup code to use
ReadFile and WriteFile().
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
We use a fake device tree in tests most of the time since tests don't
normally care about the actual data. For example, for U-Boot proper we use
U_BOOT_DTB_DATA which is just a four-character string. This makes testing
the image output against an expected value very easy.
However in some cases, such as when the test wants to check that the DT
output containing particular nodes, we do actually need the real DT. Add
support for this, along with a command-line option to select 'test mode'.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
We always have a device tree for U-Boot proper. But we may also have one
for SPL and TPL. Add a new Entry method to find out what DTs an entry
has, and use that list when updating DTs.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
At present we have a few calls to device-tree functions in binman and plan
to add more as we add new entry types which need to report their results.
It makes sense to put this code in a central place so that we can make
sure all device trees are updated. At present we only have U-Boot proper,
but plan to add SPL and TPL too.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
At present the control module has state information in it, since it is the
primary user of this. But it is a bit odd to have entries and other
modules importing control to obtain this information.
It seems better to have a dedicated state module, which control can use as
well. Create a new module using code from control and update other modules
to use it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Simon Glass