All boards which use DM_MMC have now been converted to use DM_MMC_OPS.
Drop the option and good riddance.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
At present if U-Boot proper uses driver model for MMC, then SPL has to
also. While this is desirable, it places a significant barrier to moving
to driver model in some cases. For example, with a space-constrained SPL
it may be necessary to enable CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA which involves
adjusting some drivers.
Add new SPL versions of the options for DM_MMC, DM_MMC_OPS and BLK. By
default these follow their non-SPL versions, but this can be changed by
boards which need it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Add new configuration option CONFIG_MMC_TINY which strips away all
memory allocation within the MMC code and code for handling multiple
cards. This allows extremely space-constrained SPL code use the MMC
framework.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To prevent the compiler error, split the checking condition whether
cfg->ops is NULL or not.
It's more clearly, because it's not included in mmc_config structure
when CONFIG_DM_MMC_OPS is disabled.
drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c: In function ‘mmc_create’:
drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c:118:31: error: ‘const struct mmc_config’ has no member named ‘ops’
drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c:118:58: error: ‘const struct mmc_config’ has no member named ‘ops’
make[1]: *** [drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
At present the MMC subsystem maintains its own list of MMC devices. This
cannot work with driver model, which needs to maintain this itself. Move the
list code into a separate 'legacy' file. The core MMC code remains, and will
be shared with the driver-model implementation.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Simon Glass
Marek Vasut
Jaehoon Chung