There is no need to populate multiple irq info entries with the same
bus number and device number, but with different interrupt pin. We
can use the same entry to store all the 4 interrupt pin (INT A/B/C/D)
routing information to reduce the whole PIRQ routing table size.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
In fill_irq_info() pci device's function number is written into
the table, however this is not really necessary. The function
number can be anything as OS doesn't care about this field,
neither does the PIRQ routing specification. Change to always
writing 0 as the function number.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
We should write correct bus number to the PIRQ routing table for the
irq router from device tree, instead of hard-coded zero.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
If pirq_routing_table points to NULL, that means U-Boot fails to
generate the table before in create_pirq_routing_table(), so we
test it against NULL before actually writing it.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
PIRQ routing is pretty much common in Intel chipset. It has several
PIRQ links (normally 8) and corresponding registers (either in PCI
configuration space or memory-mapped IBASE) to configure the legacy
8259 IRQ vector mapping. Refactor current Queensbay PIRQ routing
support using device tree and move it to a common place, so that we
can easily add PIRQ routing support on a new platform.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Bin Meng