Whitebox
/
u-boot
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
upstream u-boot with additional patches for our devices/boards: https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-March/282789.html (AXP crashes) ; Gbit ethernet patch for some LIME2 revisions ; with SPI flash support
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
39064 Commits
3 Branches
0 Tags
148 MiB
Tag: Branch: Tree: 70f1463686
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '70f1463686'
${ noResults }
u-boot/test/py/tests/vboot/sign-images-sha256.its

43 lines
762 B
Raw Normal View History Unescape

Add verified boot information and test Add a description of how to implement verified boot using signed FIT images, and a simple test which verifies operation on sandbox. The test signs a FIT image and verifies it, then signs a FIT configuration and verifies it. Then it corrupts the signature to check that this is detected. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
12 years ago
/dts-v1/;
/ {
description = "Chrome OS kernel image with one or more FDT blobs";
#address-cells = <1>;
images {
kernel@1 {
data = /incbin/("test-kernel.bin");
type = "kernel_noload";
arch = "sandbox";
os = "linux";
compression = "none";
load = <0x4>;
entry = <0x8>;
kernel-version = <1>;
signature@1 {
rsa: add sha256-rsa2048 algorithm based on patch from andreas@oetken.name: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/294318/ commit message: I currently need support for rsa-sha256 signatures in u-boot and found out that the code for signatures is not very generic. Thus adding of different hash-algorithms for rsa-signatures is not easy to do without copy-pasting the rsa-code. I attached a patch for how I think it could be better and included support for rsa-sha256. This is a fast first shot. aditionally work: - removed checkpatch warnings - removed compiler warnings - rebased against current head Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Cc: andreas@oetken.name Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
11 years ago
algo = "sha256,rsa2048";
Add verified boot information and test Add a description of how to implement verified boot using signed FIT images, and a simple test which verifies operation on sandbox. The test signs a FIT image and verifies it, then signs a FIT configuration and verifies it. Then it corrupts the signature to check that this is detected. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
12 years ago
key-name-hint = "dev";
};
};
fdt@1 {
description = "snow";
data = /incbin/("sandbox-kernel.dtb");
type = "flat_dt";
arch = "sandbox";
compression = "none";
fdt-version = <1>;
signature@1 {
rsa: add sha256-rsa2048 algorithm based on patch from andreas@oetken.name: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/294318/ commit message: I currently need support for rsa-sha256 signatures in u-boot and found out that the code for signatures is not very generic. Thus adding of different hash-algorithms for rsa-signatures is not easy to do without copy-pasting the rsa-code. I attached a patch for how I think it could be better and included support for rsa-sha256. This is a fast first shot. aditionally work: - removed checkpatch warnings - removed compiler warnings - rebased against current head Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Cc: andreas@oetken.name Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
11 years ago
algo = "sha256,rsa2048";
Add verified boot information and test Add a description of how to implement verified boot using signed FIT images, and a simple test which verifies operation on sandbox. The test signs a FIT image and verifies it, then signs a FIT configuration and verifies it. Then it corrupts the signature to check that this is detected. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
12 years ago
key-name-hint = "dev";
};
};
};
configurations {
default = "conf@1";
conf@1 {
kernel = "kernel@1";
fdt = "fdt@1";
};
};
};