When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced
gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added
that line "just in case" during development and never dropped it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
We know that uclass_get_device() does not return NULL for dev when it
succeeds but coverity does not. Add an extra check to hopefully keep it
happy.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Coverity (CID: 161690)
Fixes: 43b4156 (dm: sandbox: pwm: Add a basic pwm test)
Add test case for new interface set_invert().
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Fix typo in subject and build error in sandbox_pwm_set_invert():
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Unfortunately a test for the PWM uclass was not included when it was
submitted. This was noticed when trying to add more functionality:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/748172/
Add a simple test to get us started.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tom Rini
Simon Glass
Kever Yang