On 85xx platforms we shouldn't be using any LAWAR_* defines
but using the LAW_* ones provided by fsl-law.h. Rename any such
uses and limit the LAWAR_ to the 83xx platform as the only user so
we will get compile errors in the future.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
On 85xx platforms we shouldn't be using any LAWAR_* defines
but using the LAW_* ones provided by fsl-law.h. Rename any such
uses and limit the LAWAR_ to the 83xx platform as the only user so
we will get compile errors in the future.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
The 8544 DS doesn't have any cacheable Local Bus memories set up. By mapping
space for some anyway, we were allowing speculative loads into unmapped space,
which would cause an exception (annoying, even if ultimately harmless).
Removing LBC_CACHE_BASE, and using LBC_NONCACHE_BASE for the LBC LAW solves the
problem.
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
With the new LAW interface (set_next_law) we can move to letting the
system allocate which LAWs are used for what purpose. This makes life
a bit easier going forward with the new DDR code.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Becky Bruce <becky.bruce@freescale.com>
Move the initialization of the LAWs into C code and provide an API
to allow modification of LAWs after init.
Board code is responsible to provide a law_table and num_law_entries.
We should be able to use the same code on 86xx as well.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Kumar Gala
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Andy Fleming
wdenk