The DT spec demands a unit-address in a node name to match the "reg"
property in that node. Newer dtc versions will throw warnings if this is
not the case.
Fix all occurences in various documentation files where this was not
observed, to not give bad examples to the reader.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
The main difference between Pro4 and PXs2/LD6b is the Denali NAND
IP version. This is now distinguished by DT. Merge the two defconfig
files into uniphier_v7_defconfig.
Update the README.uniphier too.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
It has been a while since ARM Trusted Firmware supported UniPhier SoC
family. U-Boot SPL was intended as a temporary loader that runs in
secure world. It is a maintenance headache to support two different
boot mechanisms. Secure firmware is realm of ARM Trusted Firmware
and now U-Boot only serves as a non-secure boot loader for UniPhier
ARMv8 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Since commit c0efc3140e ("ARM: uniphier: change CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO
to 128KB"), the u-boot.bin should be burned at the offset 0x20000.
I missed to update README.uniphier in that commit. Now updating.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
- Rephrase the toolchains section. Leave only Linaro toolchains
since it is the most tested these days.
- Add build instruction for ARMv8 SoC boards
- Add information about "ddrmphy" command
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Now everything is done to load a raw U-Boot proper image instead of
an mkimage-processed one (as far as I tested on NAND, eMMC, NOR).
The SPL already knows the load address of the U-Boot proper without
parsing its uImage header because the load address is defined by
CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE, assuming that the two images are generated from
the same build.
My main motivation of this switch is to use u-boot-with-spl.bin, a
concatenation of u-boot-spl.bin and u-boot.bin. (I wish there were
a concatenation of u-boot-spl.bin and u-boot.img...) Anyway, this
commit would be useful for one-shot image burn.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Commit 3cb9abc9c5 ("ARM: uniphier: update U-Boot file names in
workflow") missed to update these two sentences. Fix them now.
Replace u-boot-spl-dtb.bin and u-boot-dtb.img with u-boot-spl.bin
and u-boot.img, respectively.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
PH1-Pro5 support and ProXstream2/PH1-LD6b support can coexist in one
image and there is bit more room in SPL to accommodate all of them.
Merge uniphier_pro5_defconfig into uniphier_pxs2_defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
The Boot ROM expects the boot image (SPL) in the Boot Partition 1.
So, updating images involves the hardware partition switch. It might
be a bit advanced for some users.
To be user-friendly, this commit adds a useful command to update the
images; just put SPL and U-Boot proper into the public directory of
the TFTP server and execute "run emmcupdate" from the command line.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
This GPIO controller device is used on UniPhier SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Since commit ad1ecd2063 ("fdt: Build a U-Boot binary without device
tree") and commit 03c25bcd26 ("fdt: Build an SPL binary without
device tree"), we can use shorter file names for the output images.
The default configuration for UniPhier SoCs enables CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE
and CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL. In this case, spl/u-boot-spl.bin is the
same as spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin. Likewise, u-boot.img is the same as
as u-boot-dtb.img. So, this change of the flow has no impact.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The mem_is_flash() in arch/arm/mach-uniphier/micro-support_card.c
writes/reads the tail of each NOR flash bank to check if the device
really resides there.
If CS1_SPLIT were enabled, the support card would always require two
NOR flash devices to be inserted for the correct NOR detection.
This is not probably what we want.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
These boards are similar enough to be supported in a single defconfig
file. Distinguish one from another by "DEVICE_TREE" from the command
line. The how-to-build in doc/README.uniphier should be also updated.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
These two are similar enough to be merged into a single
defconfig file. Distinguish one from another by "DEVICE_TREE"
from the command line. The how-to-build in doc/README.uniphier
should be also updated.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
The DDR SDRAM initialization code has not been mainlined yet, but
U-Boot proper should work.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
The DDR SDRAM initialization code has not been mainlined yet, but
U-Boot proper should work.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Device Tree really improves code maintainability and is now
available for SPL too.
This is the state-of-the-art implementation in U-boot.
The board files (platform data) are no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The init code for UMC (Unified Memory Controller) and PLL has not
been mainlined yet, but U-boot proper should work.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Support xHCI host driver used on Panasonic UniPhier platform.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Andre Przywara
Masahiro Yamada
Masahiro Yamada