When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
U-Boot widely uses error() as a bit noisier variant of printf().
This macro causes name conflict with the following line in
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:
# define __compiletime_error(message) __attribute__((error(message)))
This prevents us from using __compiletime_error(), and makes it
difficult to fully sync BUILD_BUG macros with Linux. (Notice
Linux's BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG is implemented by using compiletime_assert().)
Let's convert error() into now treewide-available pr_err().
Done with the help of Coccinelle, excluing tools/ directory.
The semantic patch I used is as follows:
// <smpl>
@@@@
-error
+pr_err
(...)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
[trini: Re-run Coccinelle]
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
GCC 6.2 reasonably complains about the current code:
../cmd/tpm_test.c: In function ‘do_tpmtest’:
../cmd/tpm_test.c:540:3: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
^~~
../cmd/tpm_test.c:542:4: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ‘for’
printf("\n------\n");
^~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Updated to remove C99 variable decl:
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Now that they are in their own directory, we can remove this prefix.
This makes it easier to find a file since the prefix does not get in the
way.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Acked-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
There are a lot of unrelated files in common, including all of the commands.
Moving them into their own directory makes them easier to find and is more
logical.
Some commands include non-command code, such as cmd_scsi.c. This should be
sorted out at some point so that the function can be enabled with or without
the associated command.
Unfortunately, with m68k I get this error:
m68k: + M5329AFEE
+arch/m68k/cpu/mcf532x/start.o: In function `_start':
+arch/m68k/cpu/mcf532x/start.S:159:(.text+0x452): relocation truncated to fit: R_68K_PC16 against symbol `board_init_f' defined in .text.board_init_f section in common/built-in.o
I hope someone can shed some light on what this means. I hope it isn't
depending on the position of code in the image.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Acked-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
These tests come from Chrome OS code. They are not particularly tidy but can
be useful for checking that the TPM is behaving correctly. Some knowledge of
TPM operation is required to use these.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Christophe Ricard<christophe-h.ricard@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Tom Rini
Masahiro Yamada
Stefan Brüns
Simon Glass