In addition to the error message also display the error code. I had the
problem that my malloc memory was not enough (ENOMEM), and if u-boot
had displayed the error code immediately that would have saved me some
debugging.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <walle@corscience.de>
Use ubifs_err instead of printf.
Add "errno=%d" in output as suggested by Albert Aribaud.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weber <weber@corscience.de>
The above warning was introduced originally in 436da3c "ext2load:
increase read speed" and fixed for newer toolchains in b803273 "ext2fs:
fix warning: 'blocknxt' may be used uninitialized". This change did not
fix the warning with gcc 4.2, as found in ELDK 4.2.
If we rework the while loop to initalize blocknxt before entering the
warning really goes away. Tested on am335x with an approx 7mb file and
crc32 in U-Boot befor and after this change.
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <u-boot@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Cc: Reinhard Arlt <reinhard.arlt@esd-electronics.com>
Cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
This warning was introduced in 436da3c "ext2load: increase read
speed":
ext2fs.c: In function 'ext2fs_read_file':
ext2fs.c:458:19: warning: 'blocknxt' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
this change makes it go away.
Cc: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <u-boot@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Cc: Reinhard Arlt <reinhard.arlt@esd-electronics.com>
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
This patch dramatically drops the amount of time u-boot needs to read a
file from an ext2 partition. On a typical 2 to 5 MB file (kernels and
initrds) it goes from tens of seconds to a couple seconds.
All we are doing here is grouping contiguous blocks into one read.
Boot tested on Globalscale Technologies Dreamplug (Kirkwood ARM SoC)
with three different files. sha1sums were calculated in Linux
userspace, and then confirmed after ext2load.
Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <u-boot@lakedaemon.net>
Tested-by: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
Tested-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
This allows us to add a proper zalloc() func (one that does a zeroing
alloc), and removes duplicate prototypes.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Fix:
fat_write.c: In function 'find_directory_entry':
fat_write.c:826:8: warning: variable 'prevcksum' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
fat_write.c: In function 'do_fat_write':
fat_write.c:933:6: warning: variable 'root_cluster' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
fat_write.c:925:12: warning: variable 'slotptr' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Cc: Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Maximilian Schwerin <mvs@tigris.de>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
This patch removes compile errors introduced by
commit 9813b750f3
'fs/fat: Fix FAT detection to support non-DOS partition tables'
fat_write.c: In function 'disk_write':
fat_write.c:54: error: 'part_offset' undeclared (first use in this function)
fat_write.c:54: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
fat_write.c:54: error: for each function it appears in.)
fat_write.c: In function 'do_fat_write':
fat_write.c:950: error: 'part_size' undeclared (first use in this function)
These errors only appear when this code is enabled by
defining CONFIG_FAT_WRITE option.
This patch was originally part of
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/121847
Signed-off-by: Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Schwerin <mvs@tigris.de>
Fixed patch author and added all needed SoB from the original patch
and also submitter's SoB. Extended commit log.
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
After susccessful write to the FAT partition,
fsck program may print warning message due to different FAT,
provided that the filesystem supports two FATs.
This patch makes the second FAT to be same with the first one
when writing a file.
Signed-off-by: Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
The FAT filesystem fails silently in inexplicable ways when given a
filesystem with a block-size that does not match the device sector size.
In theory this is not an unsupportable combination but requires a major
rewrite of a lot of the filesystem. Until that occurs, the filesystem
should detect that scenario and display a helpful error message.
This scenario in particular occurred on a 512-byte blocksize FAT fs
stored in an El-Torito boot volume on a CD-ROM (2048-byte sector size).
Additionally, in many circumstances the ->block_read method will not
return a negative number to indicate an error but instead return 0 to
indicate the number of blocks successfully read (IE: None).
The FAT filesystem should defensively check to ensure that it got all of
the sectors that it asked for when reading.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Moffett <Kyle.D.Moffett@boeing.com>
The FAT filesystem code currently ends up requiring that the partition
table be a DOS MBR, as it checks for the DOS 0x55 0xAA signature on the
partition table (which may be Mac, EFI, ISO9660, etc) before actually
computing the partition offset.
This fixes support for accessing a FAT filesystem in an ISO9660 boot
volume (El-Torito format) by reordering the filesystem checks and
reading the 0x55 0xAA "DOS boot signature" and FAT/FAT32 magic number
from the first sector of the partition instead of from sector 0.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Moffett <Kyle.D.Moffett@boeing.com>
Fix build warning: fat.c: In function 'fat_register_device':
fat.c:66:15: warning: variable 'found_partition' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Make ext2 use cache line aligned buffers for reading from the filesystem.
This is needed when caches are enabled because unaligned cache invalidates
are not safe.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
The VFAT short alias checksum read from a long file name is only overwritten
when another long file name appears in a directory list. Until then it renders
short file names invisible that have the same checksum. Reset the checksum on
first match.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Mueller <martin.mueller5@de.bosch.com>
Writing a file to the FAT partition didn't work while a
test using a CF card. The test was done on mpc5200 based
board (powerpc). There is a number of problems in FAT
write code:
Compiler warning:
fat_write.c: In function 'file_fat_write':
fat_write.c:326: warning: 'counter' may be used uninitialized
in this function
fat_write.c:326: note: 'counter' was declared here
'l_filename' string is not terminated, so a file name
with garbage at the end is used as a file name as shown
by debug code.
Return value of set_contents() is not checked properly
so actually a file won't be written at all (as checked
using 'fatls' after a write attempt with 'fatwrite'
command).
do_fat_write() doesn't return the number of written bytes
if no error happened. However the return value of this
function is used to show the number of written bytes
in do_fat_fswrite().
The patch adds some debug code and fixes above mentioned
problems and also fixes a typo in error output.
NOTE: after a successful write to the FAT partition (under
U-Boot) the partition was checked under Linux using fsck.
The partition needed fixing FATs:
-bash-3.2# fsck -a /dev/sda1
fsck 1.39 (29-May-2006)
dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN
FATs differ but appear to be intact. Using first FAT.
Performing changes.
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Cc: Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Aaron Williams <Aaron.Williams@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@samsung.com>
The DIRENTSPERBLOCK utilizes sizeof() which will return a size_t which has no
fixed size. Therefor use correct length modifer for printf() statement to
prevent compiler warnings.
This patch fixes following warning:
---8<---
fat.c: In function 'do_fat_read':
fat.c:879: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'
--->8---
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann <biessmann@corscience.de>
cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
cc: Thomas Chou <thomas@wytron.com.tw>
cc: rjones@nexus-tech.net
cc: kharris@nexus-tech.net
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Fix:
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_GarbageCollectBlock':
yaffs_guts.c:2761:6: warning: variable 'retVal' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Here GCC actually detected a bug. The code was always returning OK
instead of the previously set retrun code. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: William Juul <wiljuul@cisco.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Acked-by: William Juul <wiljuul@cisco.com>
Sorry if this is already fixed somewhere - I could not find it.
This fixes the warnings show below.
yaffs_tagscompat.c: In function 'yaffs_TagsCompatabilityReadChunkWithTagsFromNAND':
yaffs_tagscompat.c:151: warning: dereferencing pointer 'tu' does break strict-aliasing rules
yaffs_tagscompat.c:150: warning: dereferencing pointer 'tu' does break strict-aliasing rules
yaffs_tagscompat.c:149: warning: dereferencing pointer 'tu' does break strict-aliasing rules
yaffs_tagscompat.c:148: warning: dereferencing pointer 'tu' does break strict-aliasing rules
yaffs_tagscompat.c:147: warning: dereferencing pointer 'tu' does break strict-aliasing rules
yaffs_tagscompat.c:146: warning: dereferencing pointer 'tu' does break strict-aliasing rules
yaffs_tagscompat.c:145: warning: dereferencing pointer 'tu' does break strict-aliasing rules
yaffs_tagscompat.c:144: warning: dereferencing pointer 'tu' does break strict-aliasing rules
yaffs_tagscompat.c:141: note: initialized from here
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Fix:
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_CheckChunkErased':
yaffs_guts.c:854:6: warning: variable 'result' set but not used
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_UpdateObjectHeader':
yaffs_guts.c:3463:6: warning: variable 'result' set but not used
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_GrabChunkCache':
yaffs_guts.c:3774:6: warning: variable 'pushout' set but not used
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_Scan':
yaffs_guts.c:5237:6: warning: variable 'result' set but not used
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_CheckObjectDetailsLoaded':
yaffs_guts.c:5748:6: warning: variable 'alloc_failed' set but not used
yaffs_guts.c:5747:6: warning: variable 'result' set but not used
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_ScanBackwards':
yaffs_guts.c:5808:6: warning: variable 'deleted' set but not used
yaffs_guts.c:5806:6: warning: variable 'result' set but not used
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_GetObjectName':
yaffs_guts.c:6657:7: warning: variable 'result' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Fix:
fat.c: In function 'fat_register_device':
fat.c:74:19: warning: variable 'info' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_ReadDataFromFile':
yaffs_guts.c:4461:8: warning: 'chunk' may be used uninitialized in this function
yaffs_guts.c:4462:8: warning: 'start' may be used uninitialized in this function
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_WriteDataToFile':
yaffs_guts.c:4581:8: warning: 'chunk' may be used uninitialized in this function
yaffs_guts.c:4582:8: warning: 'start' may be used uninitialized in this function
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_ResizeFile':
yaffs_guts.c:4816:8: warning: 'newSizeOfPartialChunk' may be used uninitialized
in this function
yaffs_guts.c:4817:8: warning: 'newFullChunks' may be used uninitialized in this
function
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: William Juul <william.juul@tandberg.com>
Drop yaffs_DeleteWorker():
yaffs_guts.c:1556:12: warning: 'yaffs_DeleteWorker' defined but not used
Drop yaffs_VerifyTnodeWorker():
yaffs_guts.c:600:12: warning: 'yaffs_VerifyTnodeWorker' defined but not used
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
ATTR_VFAT condition requires multiple bits to be set but the present
condition checking in do_fat_read() & get_dentfromdir() ends up
passing on even a single bit being set.
Signed-off-by: J. Vijayanand <vijayanand.jayaraman@in.bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Commit c30a15e "FAT: Add FAT write feature" introduced a compiler
warning. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
In some cases, saving data in RAM as a file with FAT format is required.
This patch allows the file to be written in FAT formatted partition.
The usage is similar with reading a file.
First, fat_register_device function is called before file_fat_write function
in order to set target partition.
Then, file_fat_write function is invoked with desired file name,
start ram address for writing data, and file size.
Signed-off-by: Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Currently, if a device read request is done that does not begin or end
on a sector boundary a stack allocated bounce buffer is used to perform
the read, and then just the part of the sector that is needed is copied
into the users buffer. This stack allocation can mean that the bounce
buffer will not be aligned to the dcache line size. This is a problem
when caches are enabled because unaligned cache invalidates are not
safe.
This patch uses ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER to create a stack allocated
cache line size aligned bounce buffer.
Signed-off-by: Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Dave Liu <r63238@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@gmail.com>
Cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Change-Id: I32e1594d90ef039137bb219b0f7ced55768744ff
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
The top level Makefile does not do any recursion into subdirs when
cleaning, so these clean/distclean targets in random arch/board dirs
never get used. Punt them all.
MAKEALL didn't report any errors related to this that I could see.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
This patch fixes an issue when ubifs reads a bad superblock. Later it
tries to free memory, that was not allocated, which freezes u-boot.
This is fixed by looking for a non null pointer before free.
The message I got before u-boot freezes:
UBI: max/mean erase counter: 53/32
UBIFS: mounted UBI device 0, volume 1, name "rootfs"
UBIFS: mounted read-only
UBIFS: file system size: 49140 bytes (50319360 KiB, 0 MiB, 49140 LEBs)
UBIFS: journal size: 49 bytes (6838272 KiB, 0 MiB, 6678 LEBs)
UBIFS: media format: w4/r0 (latest is w4/r0)
UBIFS: default compressor: LZO
UBIFS: reserved for root: 0 bytes (0 KiB)
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_read_node: bad node type (255 but expected 9)
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_read_node: bad node at LEB 330:13104
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_iget: failed to read inode 1, error -22
Error reading superblock on volume 'ubi:rootfs'!
Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel <larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Fix:
jffs2_1pass.c: In function 'jffs2_1pass_read_inode':
jffs2_1pass.c:699:7: warning: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
jffs2_1pass.c: In function 'jffs2_1pass_build_lists':
jffs2_1pass.c:1578:14: warning: variable 'empty_start' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Currently in do_fat_read() when reading FAT sectors, we have to divide down
LINEAR_PREFETCH_SIZE by the sector size, whereas it's defined as 2 sectors
worth of bytes. In order to avoid redundant multiplication/division, introduce
#define PREFETCH_BLOCKS instead of #define LINEAR_PREFETCH_SIZE.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
The root directory cluster field only exists in a FAT32 boot sector, so the
'root_cluster' variable in do_fat_read() contains garbage in case of FAT12/16.
Make it contain 0 instead as this is what is passed to get_vfatname() in that
case anyway.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
The code multiples the FAT size in sectors by the sector size and then tries to
compare that to the number of sectors in the 'getsize' variable. While fixing
this, also change the initial value of 'getsize' as the division of FATBUFSIZE
by the sector size gets us FATBUFBLOCKS.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Apple iPod nanos have sector sizes of 2 or 4 KiB, which crashes U-Boot when it
tries to read the boot sector into 512-byte buffer situated on stack. Make the
FAT code indifferent to the sector size.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Commit 46d7274 "UBIFS: Change ubifsload to set the filesize variable"
introduced the follwing compiler warning:
ubifs.c: In function 'ubifs_load':
ubifs.c:742: warning: format '%lX' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'u32'
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Bastian Ruppert <Bastian.Ruppert@Sewerin.de>
This is the same behaviour like tftp or fatload command.
Signed-off-by: Bastian Ruppert <Bastian.Ruppert@Sewerin.de>
CC: kmpark@infradead.org
Acked-by: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
Fix these:
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_ReadDataFromFile':
yaffs_guts.c:4622: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of 'yaffs_AddrToChunk' differ in signedness
yaffs_guts.c:4622: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'yaffs_AddrToChunk' differ in signedness
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_WriteDataToFile':
yaffs_guts.c:4745: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of 'yaffs_AddrToChunk' differ in signedness
yaffs_guts.c:4745: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'yaffs_AddrToChunk' differ in signedness
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_ResizeFile':
yaffs_guts.c:4968: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of 'yaffs_AddrToChunk' differ in signedness
yaffs_guts.c:4968: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'yaffs_AddrToChunk' differ in signedness
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_GutsInitialise':
yaffs_guts.c:7235: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_CreateNewObject':
yaffs_guts.c:2143: warning: 'tn' may be used uninitialized in this function
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_MknodObject':
yaffs_guts.c:2258: warning: 'str' may be used uninitialized in this function
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Fix these:
yaffs_guts.c: At top level:
yaffs_guts.c:400: warning: 'yaffs_SkipFullVerification' defined but not used
Testing shows no changes of the image sizes.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Fix these:
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_Scan':
yaffs_guts.c:5436: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'yaffs_QueryInitialBlockState' differ in signedness
yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_ScanBackwards':
yaffs_guts.c:6017: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'yaffs_QueryInitialBlockState' differ in signedness
yaffs_nand.c: In function 'yaffs_QueryInitialBlockState':
yaffs_nand.c:109: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'dev->queryNANDBlock' differ in signedness
yaffs_nand.c:113: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'yaffs_TagsCompatabilityQueryNANDBlock' differ in signedness
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Drop the "-DNO_Y_INLINE" setting to fix these:
yaffs_guts.h:806: warning: 'yaffs_GetBlockInfo' defined but not used
Impact on image size is negligible - for the VCMA9 board the text
segment size grew from 496353 to 496357 bytes (i. e. 0.0008%);
total image size even remained constant.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Fix these:
yaffscfg.c: In function 'cmd_yaffs_mread_file':
yaffscfg.c:316: warning: format '%08x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'char *'
yaffscfg.c: In function 'cmd_yaffs_ls': yaffscfg.c:371: warning: format '%7d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'off_t'
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Free private_data member element before freeing file structure.
This was causing malloc to crash. Also remove unnecessary variable
assigments as file structure gets free'd as well.
Signed-off-by: Rod Boyce <uboot@teamboyce.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
There was a mix of UTF-8 and ISO-8859 files in the U-Boot source
tree, which could cause issues with the patchwork review system.
This commit converts all ISO-8859 files to UTF-8.
Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Previously reading or writing zero full sectors (reading the end of
one sector and the beginning of the next for example) was special
cased and involved stack allocating a second sector buffer. This
change uses the same code path for this case as well as when there
are a non-zero number of full sectors to access. The result is
easier to read and reduces the maximum stack used.
Signed-off-by: Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
Fix all checkpatch violations in the low level Ext2 block
device reading code. This is done in preparation for cleaning
up the partial sector access code.
Signed-off-by: Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
Fat directory handling didn't check reaching the end of the root directory. It
relied on a stop condition based on a directory entry with a name starting with
a '\0' character. This check in itself is wrong ('\0' indicates free entry, not
end_of_directory) but outside the scope of this fix. For FAT32, the end of the
rootdir is reached when the end of the cluster chain is reached. The code didn't
check this condition and started to read an incorrect cluster. This caused a
subsequent read request of a sector outside the range of the usb stick in
use. On its turn, the usb stick protested with a stall handshake.
Both FAT32 and non-FAT32 (FAT16/FAT12) end or rootdir checks have been put in.
Signed-off-by: Erik Hansen <erik@makarta.com>