These are a pain with driver model because we might have different EHCI
drivers which want to implement them differently. Now that they use
consistent function signatures, we can in good conscience move them to
a struct.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Fix non-driver-model EHCI to set up the EHCI operations correctly:
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Adjust this function so that it is passed an EHCI controller pointer so that
implementations can look up their controller. This makes the weak functions
use a consistent API.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Adjust this function so that it is passed an EHCI controller pointer so that
implementations can look up their controller. This makes the weak functions
use a consistent API.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Adjust this function so that it is passed an EHCI controller pointer so that
implementations can look up their controller.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
This patch adds support to both Faraday FUSBH200 and FOTG210,
the differences between Faraday EHCI and standard EHCI are
listed bellow:
1. The PORTSC starts at 0x30 instead of 0x44.
2. The CONFIGFLAG(0x40) is not only un-implemented, and
also has its address space removed.
3. Faraday EHCI is a TDI design, but it doesn't
compatible with the general TDI implementation
found at both U-Boot and Linux.
4. The ISOC descriptors differ from standard EHCI in
several ways. But since U-boot doesn't support ISOC,
we don't have to worry about that.
Signed-off-by: Kuo-Jung Su <dantesu@faraday-tech.com>
CC: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Simon Glass
Troy Kisky
Wolfgang Denk
Kuo-Jung Su