Now CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is not defined in Kconfig, so
"!depends on SPL_BUILD" and "if !SPL_BUILD" are redundant.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
When Kconfig for U-boot was examined, one of the biggest issues was
how to support multiple images (Normal, SPL, TPL). There were
actually two options, "single .config" and "multiple .config".
After some discussions and thought experiments, I chose the latter,
i.e. to create ".config", "spl/.config", "tpl/.config" for Normal,
SPL, TPL, respectively.
It is true that the "multiple .config" strategy provided us the
maximum flexibility and helped to avoid duplicating CONFIGs among
Normal, SPL, TPL, but I have noticed some fatal problems:
[1] It is impossible to share CONFIG options across the images.
If you change the configuration of Main image, you often have to
adjust some SPL configurations correspondingly. Currently, we
cannot handle the dependencies between them. It means one of the
biggest advantages of Kconfig is lost.
[2] It is too painful to change both ".config" and "spl/.config".
Sunxi guys started to work around this problem by creating a new
configuration target. Commit cbdd9a9737 (sunxi: kconfig: Add
%_felconfig rule to enable FEL build of sunxi platforms.) added
"make *_felconfig" to enable CONFIG_SPL_FEL on both images.
Changing the configuration of multiple images in one command is a
generic demand. The current implementation cannot propose any
good solution about this.
[3] Kconfig files are getting ugly and difficult to understand.
Commit b724bd7d63 (dm: Kconfig: Move CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to
Kconfig) has sprinkled "if !SPL_BUILD" over the Kconfig files.
[4] The build system got more complicated than it should be.
To adjust Linux-originated Kconfig to U-Boot, the helper script
"scripts/multiconfig.sh" was introduced. Writing a complicated
text processor is a shell script sometimes caused problems.
Now I believe the "single .config" will serve us better. With it,
all the problems above would go away. Instead, we will have to add
some CONFIG_SPL_* (and CONFIG_TPL_*) options such as CONFIG_SPL_DM,
but we will not have much. Anyway, this is what we do now in
scripts/Makefile.spl.
I admit my mistake with my apology and this commit switches to the
single .config configuration.
It is not so difficult to do that:
- Remove unnecessary processings from scripts/multiconfig.sh
This file will remain for a while to support the current defconfig
format. It will be removed after more cleanups are done.
- Adjust some makefiles and Kconfigs
- Add some entries to include/config_uncmd_spl.h and the new file
scripts/Makefile.uncmd_spl. Some CONFIG options that are not
supported on SPL must be disabled because one .config is shared
between SPL and U-Boot proper going forward. I know this is not
a beautiful solution and I think we can do better, but let's see
how much we will have to describe them.
- update doc/README.kconfig
More cleaning up patches will follow this.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
At present defaults in arch-specific Kconfig files are ignored if the
top-level item comes ahead of it in include order. This means that it is
not possible to have a U-Boot default that architectures and boards can
override. This does not seem very useful.
Move the include earlier to support this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
It is true that malloc is necessary for Driver Model before
relocation, but there is no good reason to reserve the malloc
space more than enough. The default value 0x400 works well.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Commit referenced in subject breaks IGEP0032 build with the following
error:
drivers/misc/status_led.c:30:7: error: 'RED_LED_GPIO' undeclared here (not in a function)
scripts/Makefile.build:275: recipe for target 'drivers/misc/status_led.o' failed
make[2]: *** [drivers/misc/status_led.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:420: recipe for target 'drivers/misc' failed
make[1]: *** [drivers/misc] Error 2
Makefile:1093: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
Fix this by skipping the status led on IGEP0032 machine as is not available
and throw an error for future machines if the status led is not configured
to avoid build breakage.
Reported-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Fix bus width switching from 8-bit mode down to 4-bit or 1-bit modes on
Samsung SoCs using SDHCI_QUIRK_USE_WIDE8. These SoCs report controller
version 2.0 yet they support 8-bit bus widths. If 8-bit mode was
previously enabled and then an operation like "mmc dev" caused a switch
back down to 4-bit or 1-bit mode, WIDE8 was left set, causing failures.
This problem was manifested by "mmc dev" timing out.
Signed-off-by: Matt Reimer <mreimer@sdgsystems.com>
Depending on the boot priority, the eMMC/SD cards,
can be initialized with the same numbers for each boot.
To be sure which mmc device is SD and which is eMMC,
this info is printed by 'mmc list' command, when
the init is done.
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>
Before this commit, the mmc devices were always registered
in the same order. So dwmmc channel 0 was registered as mmc 0,
channel 1 as mmc 1, etc.
In case of possibility to boot from more then one device,
the CONFIG_SYS_MMC_ENV_DEV should always point to right mmc device.
This can be achieved by init boot device as first, so it will be
always registered as mmc 0. Thanks to this, the 'saveenv' command
will work fine for all mmc boot devices.
Exynos based boards usually uses mmc host channels configuration:
- 0, or 0+1 for 8 bit - as a default boot device (usually eMMC)
- 2 for 4bit - as an optional boot device (usually SD card slot)
And usually the boot order is defined by OM pin configuration,
which can be changed in a few ways, eg.
- Odroid U3 - eMMC card insertion -> first boot from eMMC
- Odroid X2/XU3 - boot priority jumper
By this commit, Exynos dwmmc driver will check the OM pin configuration,
and then try to init the boot device and register it as mmc 0.
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Cc: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
High Capacity (e)MMC cards work fine on sun4i / sun5i, and not having this
capability set causes u-boot to not recognize the eMMC on an Utoo P66 A13
tablet, so always set it thereby fixing this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Clksel value is exynos specific value.
It removed "clksel_val" into dwmci_host and created the
"dwmci_exynos_priv_data" structure for exynos specific data.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
"clksel_val" is assigned to property of mmc or defined value.
But it doesn't write at initial sequence.
There is a reason that get the wrong source-clock value.
This patch fixed it.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
The SD/MMC version scheme was buggy when dealing with standard
major.minor.change cases. Fix it by using something similar to
the linux's kernel versioning method.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>
Tested-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Right now U-Boot supports the CONFIG_OLD_SUNXI_KERNEL_COMPAT option,
which makes it go out of its way in limiting the selection of PLL clock
frequencies and PMIC voltages in order not to upset outdated buggy
sunxi-3.4 kernel releases. And if the CONFIG_OLD_SUNXI_KERNEL_COMPAT
option is not set, then booting such old kernels exhibits various
failures at runtime. This is very user unfriendly, and there were
already several incidents when people wasted their time being hit
by these runtime failures and trying to debug them.
The right solution is not to add hacks and workarounds to the mainline
U-Boot, but to fix these bugs in the sunxi-3.4 kernel. And in fact,
the updated sunxi-3.4 kernels already exist. Still we need to follow
the 'Principle of Least Surprise' and U-Boot needs to ensure that
the old buggy kernels are not getting happily booted when the
CONFIG_OLD_SUNXI_KERNEL_COMPAT option is not set. And this patch
addresses this particular issue.
This patch makes U-Boot store the 'compatibility revision' number in
the top 4 bits of the machine id and pass it to the kernel. The old
buggy kernels will fail to load with a very much googlable error
message on the serial console (the "r1 = 0x100010bb" part of it):
"Error: unrecognized/unsupported machine ID (r1 = 0x100010bb)"
This error message can be documented in the linux-sunxi wiki with
proper explanations about how to resolve this situation and where
to get the necessary bugfixes for the sunxi-3.4 kernel.
The fixed sunxi-3.4 kernels implement a revision compatibility check
and clear the top 4 bits of the machine id if everything is alright.
By accepting the machine id with the bits 31:28 set to 1, the sunxi-3.4
kernel effectively certifies that it has the PLL5 clock speed and
AXP209 DCDC3 voltage fixes applied.
It is still possible to set the CONFIG_OLD_SUNXI_KERNEL_COMPAT option
in U-Boot if the user desires to use an outdated unpatched sunxi-3.4
kernel.
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
While discussing with some people how to get the Linux kernel to do the
right thing wrt sending output to both the serial console and the
hdmi out / lcd screen when booting on ARM devices, Grant Likely pointed out
that there already is a solution for this.
All we need to do is set the /chosen/stdout-path fdt property, and if no
console= arguments were specified on the kernel commandline the kernel
will honor this and add this device as a console (next to the primary
video output on hdmi).
And u-boot already has support for setting this, all we need to do is
define OF_STDOUT_PATH and then everything will just work ootb, without
people needing to meddle with adding console= arguments in extlinux.conf .
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Older linux-sunxi-3.4 kernels override our PLL6 setting with 300 MHz,
halving the mbus frequency, so set it to 300 MHz ourselves and base the
mbus divider on that.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Sending out 5V when there is a charger connected to the otg port is not a
good idea, so check for this and error out.
Note this commit currently breaks otg support on the q8h tablets, as we need
to do some magic with the pmic there to get vbus info, this is deliberate
(better safe then sorry), fixing this is on my TODO list.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
The UTOO P66 is a 6" A13 tablet / lcd ereader. It features a 6" 480x800 ips
lcd screen, 512MB RAM & 4GB emmc.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
High Capacity (e)MMC cards work fine on sun4i / sun5i, and not having this
capability set causes u-boot to not recognize the eMMC on an Utoo P66 A13
tablet, so always set it thereby fixing this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
USB doesn't seem to work yet; the controller detects the on-board Hub/
Ethernet device but can't read the descriptors from it. I haven't
investigated yet.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
The bcm2835 and bcm2836 are essentially identical, except:
- The CPU is an ARM1176 v.s. a quad-core Cortex-A7.
- The physical address of many IO controllers has moved.
Rather than introducing a whole new bcm2836 value for $(SOC) or $(ARCH),
update the existing bcm2835 code to handle the minor differences, and
plumb it into the ARMv7 CPU architecture.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
This commit adds $(srctree)/arch/arm/$(machdirs)/include/mach to
the headers search path.
It allows us to replace "#include <asm/arch/foo.h>" with
"#include <mach/foo.h>". As "#include <asm/arch/foo.h>" is still
supported, we can modify each file one by one.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
In U-Boot, SoC-specific headers are placed in
arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/arch-$(SOC) and a symbolic link to that
directory is created at the early stage of the build process.
Creating and removing a symbolic link during the build is not
preferred. In fact, Linux Kernel did away with include/asm-$(ARCH)
directories a long time time ago.
As for ARM, now it is possible to collect SoC sources into
arch/arm/mach-$(SOC). It is also reasonable to move SoC headers
into arch/arm/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach.
This commit prepares for that.
If the directory arch/$(ARCH)/mach-$(SOC)/include/mach exists,
a symbolic to that directory is created. Otherwise, a symbolic link
to arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/arch-$(SOC) or arch-$(CPU) is created.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Move
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/* -> arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/*
Note:
Perhaps, can we merge arch/arm/mach-kirkwood and
arch/arm/mvebu-common into arch/arm/mach-mvebu, like Linux?
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafulla@marvell.com>
Cc: Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@sartura.hr>
In U-boot, the directory structure, arch/$(ARCH)/cpu/$(CPU)/$(SOC)/
has been adopted except that $(CPU) is missing from some
architectures and $(SOC) is missing from some CPUs.
This structure did not fit very well in some cases.
[1] AT91
AT91 SoC family have been developed across some ARM processor
generations. Generally speaking, some IPs are often re-used in the
same SoC family (same SoC vendor) even when the main processor is
updated. As a result, a SoC-common directory is needed in the upper
level. Currently, AT91 source files are placed as follows:
arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91/*
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/*
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/at91/*
arch/arm/cpu/at91-common/*
Once directories are split, the motivation for refactorings across
CPU directories is lost. Some files in arm920t/at91/ and
arm926ejs/at91/ are so similar that they could be merged.
[2] Tegra
Tegra is a little bit special case where different CPUs are used for
SPL and the main U-boot. To obey the arch/$(ARCH)/cpu/$(CPU)/$(SOC)
structure, the source files must be placed across the CPUs,
again SoC-common directory is necessary in the upper level.
Moreover, there are several families in Tegra: Tegra20, Tegra30,
Tegra114, Tegra124. Here again, the tegra-common directory is needed
to contain commonly-used files.
Tegra directories have been sprinkled in the directory structure.
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra20
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra114
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra124
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra-common
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra30
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra114
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra124
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra-common
arch/arm/cpu/tegra20-common
arch/arm/cpu/tegra30-common
arch/arm/cpu/tegra114-common
arch/arm/cpu/tegra124-common
arch/arm/cpu/tegra-common
As you see, splitting SoC code by the CPU is not going well,
especially for ARM.
Why don't we collect SoC-specific files into a single place?
A good example we can follow is Linux's arch/arm/mach-* structure.
This item was discussed in the following thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/188548/
Looks like I got some positive responses and we are almost ready to
start this movement.
This commit prepares arch/arm/Makefile for describing machdirs in it.
After this commit, we can move SoC directory to arch/arm/mach-$(SOC)
in simple steps although some cases such as AT91 and Tegra need more
fixes.
What we generally have to do is:
[1] Move files arch/arm/cpu/$(CPU)/$(SOC)/* to arch/arm/mach-$(SOC)/*
[2] Add machine entry into arch/arm/Makefile
[3] Remove "obj-y += $(SOC)" from arch/arm/cpu/$(CPU)/Makefile
[4] Fix the Kconfig file path in arch/arm/Kconfig
[5] Modify MAINTAINERS if necessary
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
The board select menu in arch/arm/Kconfig is still big.
To slim down it, this commit moves AT91 boards to
arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.
Also, consolidate "config SYS_SOC" in each board Kconfig.
The Kconfig files under board/ directory were modified with the
following command:
find board -name Kconfig | xargs sed -i -e '
/config SYS_SOC/ {
N
/default "at91"/ {
N
d
}
}
'
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Acked-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.co>
Add support for the 6" 480x800 tl059wv5c0 panel used on e.g. Utoo P66 and
Aigo M60/M608/M606 tablets.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
This commits adds support for configuring a a bitbang i2c controller, which
is used on some boards to configure the LCD panel (via i2c).
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
On some boards there is a gpio to reset the LCD panel, add support for this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Since device_unbind() is also defined in device-remove.c,
which is compiled in only in case CONFIG_DM_DEVICE_REMOVE
is defined, protect the device_unbind() prototype with the
same CONFIG_DM_DEVICE_REMOVE check.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Add debug UART functions to permit ns16550 to provide an early debug UART.
Try to avoid using the stack so that this can be called from assembler before
a stack is set up (at least on ARM and PowerPC).
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
For the debug UART we need to be able to provide any parameters before
driver model is set up. Add parameters to the low-level access functions
to make this possible.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>